@
rha.
If we got enough battles we could take Bechafen to contested.
The Talas have to have 50% more than the combined totals of us and Stirland.
Stirland's total cannot change unless they post skirmishes - maybe we need to point that out to them
I am not sure how it is working?
Talas have 75475
We have 33825 plus Stirland have 22750 = 56575.
[They are 18900 ahead of the combined total of the other factions]
Now + 50% of 56575 makes 84863 ?? which should mean they do not have control??
So I am not sure what the maths are.
Basically I imagine that we need to make up some of the difference to a certain point and then to keep overall control they will have to post DOUBLE our points thereafter..................
@
Vann HarlGood luck with he tourney, and see what Rorrak said about 'phone home'
["VH Phone Home"]
@
Rorrak Yes we got caught out with a poor round just when they had a cracker.
They had a dedicated team of 6/7 who all played and posted big - we had more contributors/members, but with a much more sporadic gaming pattern..............
If only we could suddenly have 25 or so members suddenly appear this round with 1 or 2 battles each and it would be us posting 35 battles, and maybe really contesting ..........
............ but such is the fickle nature of internet warring, and the inability of commanders to put itinerant generals in front of a firing squad ..
Still it has generally been great fun; the campaign fluff and literature was brilliant, and the concept magnificent ...............
............. and I have devoted far too much time to it.