Hello all,
After redoing my army list last night I have a few general (and maybe specific) questions about the army.
1) How do you find your Arch lector on war alter to fair in games? After looking at him again, he actually seems like a decent choice besides the fact that he takes up a good amount of points without even beginning to kit him out...
2)What is the reason for the prevalence of characters in many lists I see. I know Empire is all about the buffs and synergy and thats what characters do for Empire but in my lists at least I prefer many and varying units that can work together.
3) Why oh why the 50+ units with huge detachments and major buffs on them?! I understand that some people may feel that that is the best way to play empire but how is that really playing. If you run 3 units, 1 of which is impossible to move with any tactical sense and you just wait for the enemy to close and hold them up all game, how are you really playing the game...(and how does that not get stale after 2 seconds)
(sorry for the ranty tone but I hate hordes with a burning passion)
With my empire I run units of 30 which people may immediately say is way too small but I prefer the flexibility the units offer...and I can have more of them.
4) What is the general consensus on cavalry? I know that they are favored now by some and that some like to run huge cav units. I plan to use a unit of 6 Reiksguard knights, 5 inner circle and 5 regular knights with great weapons in 2500. The idea is that the cavalry is held in "strategic reserve" until they are needed in the battle to work around the enemy flanks and charge into units tied up by my infantry.
Thanks