Suck my anus you rules indoctrinated child.
wow... chill bro
I think none considered too much what Porkix said
- 2nd game ... I play against chaos who only put 42 models on the table: 30 chaos warriors, skull canon, lord on manticore, soul grinder, lord on foot, 3 skull crushers and 5 chaos knights. I have 40 archers, 5 realms knights, 5 errant knights, 15 men at arms, 3 pegasus, 1 lord and 1 damsel (70 models). He claim sudden death because I have more models than him and the battle was a waste of time. I manage to kill the knights but the lord of chaos can bring a new unit on 4+ each of his turn so the knights came back and kill my lord. End of the game, I have killed 2-3 warriors, 1 crushers and I am wiped out...
I think it's very frustrating asking an opponent not to play this or that. For you who like AoS, congrats you found your balance. That means your army lists can't be much different from others, which would use restrictions. So why so opposed to a balance system? Unless you are playing with 30 chaos warriors, skull canon, manticore, grinder, lord, 3 crushers, 5 knights and a sudden death condition for extra trolling
Don't get me wrong. I always hated ETC rules. I was so upset when i wanted to play with Luthor Huss, but i couldn't because everyone thought of himself as a pro who must play with nothing less than the championship rules. Which they'll always be House Rules for me: all they did was "no this" and "no that"
What i'm saying is that you can never be truly free when playing a game. Either rules or agreements will set the boundaries in which you are going to play in. I just prefer rules over agreements cause i don't want arguments or surprises(house rules) before my games