home

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Fidelis von Sigmaringen

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 316
1
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Priest from GW
« on: February 15, 2017, 10:47:34 PM »
If you are just nuts, that is...

2
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Priest from GW
« on: February 15, 2017, 05:50:58 PM »
Only if it has man in it...

3
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Priest from GW
« on: February 15, 2017, 09:27:12 AM »
Or did they hear "phallus of equivocation"?

4
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Priest from GW
« on: February 14, 2017, 08:18:48 PM »
just before he was torn to bits by feminists because of the sexist slur "my dear Lady."

5
The Town Square / Re: Issue when posting images
« on: February 14, 2017, 07:57:38 PM »
The same issue was addressed here: http://warhammer-empire.com/theforum/index.php/topic,51836.25.html and the administrators are aware of it.

6
The Town Square / Re: Pure of Heart
« on: February 14, 2017, 05:51:50 PM »
By fasting and penitence.

9 Hide your face from my sins
    and blot out all my iniquity.
10 Create in me a pure heart, O God,
    and renew a steadfast spirit within me.
...

17 My sacrifice, O God, is a broken spirit;
    a broken and contrite heart
    you, God, will not despise.

(Psalm 50)

7
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Priest from GW
« on: February 14, 2017, 08:15:46 AM »
Swordspersons, I should think...

8
I should think it depends on the enemy. If he has fast moving units and flyers, your centre might be broken very quickly.

9
Looks very dynamic. If ypu want to fill ranks, do not dismiss the idea of appropriate unit fillers.

10
Dye Hard with a Vengeance...

11
Most excellent indeed!

12
The Town Square / Re: Some weirdness today with the website
« on: February 12, 2017, 09:13:43 AM »
@ Victor: If I am allowed to be my pedantic self: Pro imperio.

13
Without a glue, are we?

14
The Electors' Forum / Re: Revisiting the Richtmark Battalion [T9A]
« on: February 10, 2017, 12:48:10 PM »
It is on p. 39 of that AB.

"Countercharge: [...]If the detachment can draw a line of sight to an exposed flank of the enemy, and has enough movement to reach it, it can charge the flank, even if it would normally have to charge its front. [...]"


The same applies to Supporting Charge (ibidem).

15
The Electors' Forum / Re: Revisiting the Richtmark Battalion [T9A]
« on: February 08, 2017, 11:33:11 PM »
It is certainly true that static CR in the 8th edition did not go very far...

16
The Electors' Forum / Re: Revisiting the Richtmark Battalion [T9A]
« on: February 08, 2017, 07:37:06 PM »
Only 6e detachments had the ability to do that.
It was (at least) 6 & 7th editions. And they had both Counter & Support Charge.

17
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Preist from GW
« on: February 05, 2017, 05:44:47 PM »
Your sisters seem somewhat shy....

18
The Town Square / Re: Some weirdness today with the website
« on: February 05, 2017, 10:23:52 AM »
Thank you for the good work!

19
The Town Square / Re: Some weirdness today with the website
« on: February 03, 2017, 10:35:29 AM »
The 'Mark as read' button sort of works: the search for new posts doesn't bring the old unread posts, but the forums still show all threads that I didn't visit as 'new'.

A nuisance, not very serious.

-Z

Same here. And if you click on another page"users online", it jumps back to the Forum.

20
The Town Square / Re: Some weirdness today with the website
« on: February 02, 2017, 05:05:21 PM »
I could not access the website at all the last three days.

21
1. Nope, no Support Charge anymore - only Counter Charge.

Empire AB p. 30: "Detachments are trained to support their Regimental Units and protect them in battle. If an enemy unit declares a charge against a Regimental Unit, and the Regimental Unit does not flee as a charge reaction, then each of its unengaged Detachments within 3" can make either a Support Fire or a Counter Charge action."

And that is it - there are no rules allowing a Support Charge. 


2. What you said about Support Fire is what I said about Support Fire.

22
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Preist from GW
« on: January 22, 2017, 09:54:09 PM »
Is that why you wrote Preist in the title?  :engel:

23
The Electors' Forum / Re: Female Warrior Preist from GW
« on: January 22, 2017, 02:27:43 PM »
What Victor said. She is in the Empire's Collectors Guide.

24
O ye of liitle faith!

Unless specified otherwise, normal rules apply.

In 6/7 ABs, it was specified that Detachments
- do not cause Panic in other Empire units
- do not suffer the -1 modifier for S&S, when conducting Support Fire
- can attack the enemy in the Flank, as long as they have LoS and enough movement, when executing a Counter/Support Charge

The 8 AB does not specify any of these, therefore normal rules apply. Note that 8 AB also does not allow a Support Charge anymore.

Regarding disruption: all AB follow the normal rules here - but the 8 AB has the worst rules for our Detachments.

Some may think that the conferral of psychological effects outweighs these nerfs, but, in my opinion, they do not, in particular given the rise in point cost of state troops.

25
The Electors' Forum / Re: Is every1 still playing 8th ed?
« on: January 12, 2017, 01:46:59 PM »
Most importantly, as you acknowledge,  the BRB spells were not overpowered. [Note that the Comet of Casandora was a RiP spell, which under the old rules meant that the spell was ended if the Wizard attempted to cast a new spell, left the table or was slain. So, as long as the Comet was up, the Wizard could not cast a spell without terminating the Comet.] In addition, to cast a spell, wizards could use a maximum of PD equal to their level +1. In principle, the maximum number of dice a wizard could use was 5 per spell. The level was not added to the casting result. In the 7th edition, a wizard could only use the dice he himself generated and those of the common pool. To take your example, you may have had 10 PD a turn, but the lvl 4 could only use 6 of those.

To add: the spell selection was indeed random - you could not optimise the spell selection between various wizards.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 316