Lots more comments to get through! I'm liking how this is progressing.
@Fidelis: Fair enough, then. I'll alter the blurb for Regrowth to account for this discussion.
@Warwhore: Sure, but the "flank protector" job is done better by vanilla Knights, and those actually fill minimum Core. The Vanguard and the Brace of Pistols is really the draw here as far as I'm concerned, and I think they charge a bit too much for it.
@Krokz: Comparing across armies is not usually good form, I agree. But in this case, the reason why I mention it is because if they were cheaper, I would actually be able to fit them into a standard army list. As it is, I find that they are a bit niche, because many folks have made successful lists where they don't even get a sniff. I can alter the blurb on them to compensate, but I really don't see myself recommending them as highly as I do Greatswords, Outriders, or even Reiksguard.
The standard-bearer on the Knights is certainly useful, don't get me wrong, I'm just not of the opinion it's necessary. It's more of a "I have 10 points lying around, and this is a net positive" sort of deal, you know? You also make a good point regarding DGK champs - I'll alter my blurb to match.
@Darknight: Then the question to ask is why you're investing so much in a unit you don't actually want to risk in combat, because Stubborn will only come up if you're losing combat (and if you are, your Wizard will be in danger sooner rather than later)? When it comes to bunkers, I say keep it cheap and keep it flexible - Archers fit both of those characteristics.