Do either of you argue that the game is not better if everything is painted?
No, where did you get that idea? Read my post again.
But for me, painting is not fun. It is a chore. A chore that has a good result, but so does ironing shirts and doing dishes, and painting models is usually a bit less pressing. Again: I, personally, will make an effort to have my stuff ready by then. But that is for my personal pleasure of having it done, and I will certainly not call the trip off if I don't make it.
The arguement had got silly, silly counter points.
I understand painting armies is hard, and perhaps a chore, but you probably have some Skaven done already, and Fandir too. If you spent 4 hours a week painting (which is the time you prob spend on the forum) then by the bash you will probably have 2000 done.
Obviously I'm not saying I don't want either of you at the Bash, and I do play games vs Tostig's unpainted knights (and this friday will be the first time I use unpainted models) I'm just saying it would be more fun for me (and probably for any other opponent, and probably for you, I just don't want to put words in your mouth) if your armies were painted, and seeing as everyone else there last time, which had to be upwards of 20 people, had their full 2000 pt armies painted, I don't really see why you two guys wouldn't have 2000 pts done.
If you use the "I take ages because I am a perfectionist" arguement then I want any units painted up to be the sexiest at the BAsh. If you just don't like painting, batch do them! it takes like 30 minutes per dude.
No, where did you get that idea? Read my post again.
Wow, you are so cool man. No really, you are.
I don't play against unpainted armies, nor against people who don't have the basics of the rules.
Nor look at ugly women.
Woot! someone agrees with me.